Beware of Flying Pigs

It's happened, friends. These several days following the unprecedented elections in a free Iraq have been marked by an uncanny silence. While knowledgeable people understand that the resounding success of Sunday's elections bear much historical significance, it's certainly also said that it's the beginning of a long, difficult process. Democratic actualization in Iraq, the goal of our efforts, has taken the first (and largest) step towards reality. Liberals near and far have seen their worst nightmares acted out before their eyes. Remember that silence I noted above - that's it. President Bush, like it or not, was right. Perhaps the most shocking thing: liberals have nothing to say. Yet.

Noted liberal columnist, Mark Brown, of the Chicago Sun-Times, put a knife to the backs of his brethren when suggesting that "Bush was right, and we were wrong." While he stopped short of actually declaring out and out success for the President and his Iraqi victors, he made it quite clear that the definite possibility of Bush's correctness all along is highly feasible. "We could finally see signs that a majority of the Iraqi people perceive something to be gained from this brave new world we are forcing on them," he shared. It's about time. While the leftist silence is unusually comfortable (I find myself rather enjoying it), it's surely temporary. Claims, long since reported, of our occupying force, rather than the liberators we've been proven to be, will once again bellow from the lungs of Ted Kennedy and associates. But, America, and the world, has seen the images of Iraqis dancing, waiting, polling, and smiling as they flash with pride their stained fingers. Can it still be said that our efforts have been in vain? I should hope not. The sacrifice of American soldiers stands as a lasting testament to freedom and a global responsibility to protect it. Was it vain? Not a chance.

Iraqis now have had a taste of democratic expression. President Bush and his advisers, staff, and pundits have made it quite clear that should the newly elected Iraqi Government want us out - we get out. Until that point, it's our adopted duty ensure the training, protection, and continuing drive of the Iraqi people. President Bush and his dedication to the success of the forthcoming government has expressed his concern and devotion to the cause he vows to finish. Baghdad mayor, Ali Fadel, revealed his gratitude for the American presence when he avowed to "Build a statue for Bush. He is the symbol of freedom." Fadel went on to say that he steadfastly supports American efforts. "We have a lot of work and we are especially grateful to the soldiers of the USA for freeing our country of tyranny." It's hard to deny that.

Let's recap what we've learned thusfar. Liberal columnists are actually suggesting Bush's validity. Iraqi mayors vow to erect monuments in honor of President Bush. Thousands of civilians beaming with joy, with death looming near the ballot box, as they cast their vote to cement a free future. But, leave it to the left to doubt it all. The somehow popular Randi Rhodes, liberal talk show host and activist, smartly noted that the Iraqis had elections all along - but with Saddam Hussein being the only candidate. John Kerry pleads with the American public not to "overhype" the most historically significant event in Iraq's modern history. And, expectedly, the "cut and run" philosophy of the Democrats does little to encourage faith and hope for continued success in the Middle East. Is it a surprise to anyone? Not to me. Although it's initially disheartening, one gets rather accustomed to the annoying screech of the liberal voice. But, I'd be screeching too - if I were a liberal. Rush Limbaugh had it right, that's two elections in three months the Democrats have lost.

The fate of the Iraqi people is finally out of our hands. While we've played an integral role in thrusting democratic growth onto a populous with no more experience than fear, torture, and domination, we've always exposed the beauty's of freedom to a denied people. President Bush declared that Iraqi voters "firmly rejected the antidemocratic ideology" touted by Zarqawi and his cutthroat mobs. Dr. Condoleeza Rice wisely stated that "the insurgency is not going to go away" as a result of the election. Dr. Rice, of course, is correct. But, this momentous election is, again, the first major step towards the eradication of terror and prospering of peace in a free Iraq. America, behind President Bush, has set an example for the Iraqi people representative of our values, our convictions, and our determination. Ted Kennedy booms that Americans and Bush "must look beyond the election," and though he's right, what we see are two different things. Kennedy advocates looking beyond the election because it simply affirms President Bush and our presence in Iraq as the best thing for the Iraqi people. We, on the other hand, look beyond the election because there's work to be done. However, the firm memory of success and victory is unforgettable. It should, and will, remain constant through the upcoming structuring of a free Iraq.

Yes, friends, history has been made. Iraqis have voted. Liberals have nothing to say. While both are marvelously unparalleled, it's not difficult to declare which one has more historical meaning. The advancement of Iraq from oppression to expression has left the liberals stunned and silent. It's the sort of expression that makes me proud to be American. It's the sort of silence that makes me proud to be conservative.